Democratizing constitutional law : perspectives on legal theory and the legitimacy of constitutionalism.
By: Bustamante, Thomas.
Material type:
BookPublisher: Switzerland; Springer International Publishing; 2016Description: xi, 328 p. : 24 cm.ISBN: 9783319283692.Subject(s): Democratizing Constitutional LawDDC classification: 342.001 BUS 2016 Summary: One of the main arguments in support of Constitutional judicial review points to the need to curtail the legal and political power of majority rule instantiated by democratic legislative institutions. This article aims to challenge the counter majoritarian argument for judicial review by showing that there is very little difference,
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
សៀវភៅអង់គ្លេស
|
CSHL Library | 342.001 BUS 2016 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Browsing CSHL Library Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||||||
| 342 TAI-2017 CO.1/3 Annotated constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia : | 342 TAI-2017 CO.2/3 Annotated constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia : | 342 TAI-2017 CO.3/3 Annotated constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia : | 342.001 BUS 2016 Democratizing constitutional law : | 342.02 HILL 2010 Constitutionalism in Southeast Asia / | 342.02 PHI 2001 Constitutional and administrative law / | 342.029 MIL 2010 Framing the State in times ofj transition : |
Contents
1. Introduction
Part I. Challenging and Defending Judicial Review
Part II. Constitutional Dialogues and Constitutional Deliberation
Part III. Institutional Alternatives for Constitutional Dialogues Based .
Part IV. Constitutional Promises and Democratic Participation
Part V. Legal Theory and Constitutionalism and the Written Constitution
One of the main arguments in support of Constitutional judicial review points to the need to curtail the legal and political power of majority rule instantiated by democratic legislative institutions. This article aims to challenge the counter majoritarian argument for judicial review by showing that there is very little difference,
There are no comments for this item.